The polling server mode is one of the differentiators with Centreon. Centreon has out of the box a full catalog of probes from cloud to the edge Īs soon as you have defined your monitoring policies and template, you can deploy it fast through command line API or REST API.Ĭentreon plays well in the ITSM, Automation, AIOps spaces with many connectors for Prometheus, ServiceNow, GLPI, Ansible, Chef, Splunk.
#SHIMO APP VS FULL#
And in the end, both are full of monitoring features. Users used to say Centreon may be faster for setup and deployment. Centreon plugins have some kind of intelligence when they are launched, where Zabbix monitoring rules are configured centrally with the raw data collected. Zabbix monitoring paradigms are totally different from Centreon. See moreĬentreon is part of the Nagios ecosystem, meaning there is a huge number of resources you may find around in the community (plugins, skills, addons). To conclude, we are really pleased with the tool so far, it helped us detect several causes of issues that were a pain to solve in the past. Deployment is quite easy since it uses templates, so almost all configuration can be done on server side.
#SHIMO APP VS FREE#
Another strong point is the documentation which is widely available Zabbix Youtube channel with tutorial video's, Zabbix share which holds free templates, the Zabbix online documentation and the Zabbix forum also helped us out quite a bit. That is the major strong point about Zabbix and it's free of course. No other tool had the same amount of support onboard for our production environment and we didn't want to end up using a different tool again for several areas. We have deployed Zabbix in all of our factories for factory monitoring because after thorough investigation we saw that Zabbix supports the wide variety of Operating Systems, hardware peripherals and devices a Car Manufacturer has. I work at Volvo Car Corporation as a consultant Project Manager. Zabbix has a broader approval, being mentioned in 46 company stacks & 24 developers stacks compared to Cacti, which is listed in 5 company stacks and 5 developer stacks. Here's a link to Zabbix's open source repository on GitHub.ĭotmailer, JPush, and RELEX Solutions are some of the popular companies that use Zabbix, whereas Cacti is used by Webedia, Cosmote, and Dek-D. Zabbix is an open source tool with 514 GitHub stars and 187 GitHub forks. Zabbix is a mature and effortless enterprise-class open source monitoring solution for network monitoring and application monitoring of millions of metrics.Ĭacti and Zabbix can be categorized as "Monitoring" tools. On the other hand, Zabbix is detailed as " Track, record, alert and visualize performance and availability of IT resources". Cacti provides a fast poller, advanced graph templating, multiple data acquisition methods, and user management features out of the box. Cacti is a complete network graphing solution designed to harness the power of RRDTool's data storage and graphing functionality. Cacti vs Zabbix: What are the differences?ĭevelopers describe Cacti as " Cacti stores all of the necessary information to create graphs and populate them with data in a MySQL database".
0 kommentar(er)
